Coding workflow
Review a pull request
Look for actionable defects and explain the evidence behind each finding.
Supply your inputs
Diff, requirements, constraints. Replace the variables in braces with your own context. Ask for missing information before running the task. Do not include private information you do not need to share.
The prompt
Review the supplied diff against the supplied requirements. Identify only actionable defects introduced by the change. For each finding include file and line, triggering input, observed versus expected behavior, severity, and supporting evidence. Distinguish confirmed findings from unverified concerns. Do not claim to run tests. If context is missing, ask for it.
Requirements: {requirements}
Diff: {diff}Worked example
Requirement: return an empty list for zero items. Diff: changes a loop condition from i < items.length to i <= items.length. Review: for an empty list the loop now runs once and reads an absent element. Check how that value is used before assigning severity.
Illustrative example, not a recorded model test.
Check the result
Verify the finding against the surrounding code and reproduce it with a meaningful test. Do not accept invented file names or line numbers.
Adapt and repeat
Run a small case first. Record where the result misses a requirement, change one part of the prompt, and compare the revised output with the same checks. A confident tone does not establish accuracy.